Tokenization is when a pool becomes a real market asset. Your claim turns into plain ERC-20 YES and NO tokens you can hold in your wallet, lend, borrow against, route through other venues, or combine into more complex bets. The question is when a pool has earned that power. Section 4 comes back to the resolution benefit: because this claim is transferable, final settlement can take the time it needs without trapping every holder.
An arbitrary volume threshold, like $100,000 total volume, is lazy game theory. A whale could wash-trade both sides of a market just to force it to tokenize, or dump massive capital on a "sure thing" to trigger an order book that opens completely empty.
To prevent manipulation and preserve a simple refund path, the market uses a Robustness Strategy. A pool graduates only after both sides hold enough backing and funded, immediately fillable bid and ask depth remains above its threshold for 24 continuous hours. The separate resolution card confirms that future court funding is not part of this gate:
A whale that posts large funded quotes on both sides supplies the same executable liquidity as a market maker. Those quotes remain exposed for 24 hours, so other traders can accept any bad price. If the quotes still satisfy the gate afterward, at least 24 hours of their non-cancellable life remains to seed the new book. This proves funded market depth, not that the capital came from different people.
This is where the custody complaint gets its answer. A YES token is not an entry on anyone's book. It is a bearer asset: post it as collateral in a lending pool, move it to any venue that will take it, or hold it through resolution in a wallet only you control. Nobody can freeze the account, because there is no account. Gas is sponsored for verified humans, so holding and moving the tokens never requires pre-funding a wallet with some second currency. If every OmenMarketMaker interface vanished tomorrow, the claim in your wallet would still be yours.